THE NEXUS OF PRODUCTION QUALITY CONTROL AND THE PERFORMANCE OF SACHET WATER FIRMS IN BORI, RIVERS-STATE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/bma.v2i3.1766Keywords:
customer satisfaction, corporate growth, operational efficiency, production, qualityRemove customer satisfaction, qualityAbstract
This study was targeted at examining the nexus between production quality control and the performance of sachet water firms Bori, Rivers-state. The key performance indicators of interest to the researchers include; operational efficiency, customer satisfaction and corporate growth. The study adopted the survey approach in its design and a five point likert scale questionnaire was the major tool for data gathering. The data gathered was analyzed with Mann-Whitney test (U) and spearman’s correlation coefficient test using the 20.0 version of SPSS. The findings of the paper shows a high connectivity between production quality control on and the performance of sachet water firms in Bori as the three variables that were used to proxy performance showed different but all positive level of significant relationship. The researchers therefore recommend among others that sachet water firms in Bori should see and take production quality control as a strategic continuous process and not just one time event to secure regulatory approval.
Downloads
References
Akanwa, P.U., and Agu, C.N (2005). Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice in Nigeria. Resources Development Centre, Owerri.
Alfred S. (2011) Production Planning and control. Quality Progress Magazine: London.
Ballard G. and Gregory A. H. (2003). An Update on Last Planners: Proceeding of the International Group for Lean Construction, 11th Annual Conference. Blacksbury: Virginia.
Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Bertrand J.W.M Wijingaard J. (2005). The Structuring of Product Control Systems. Netherland: Eindhoven University of Technology.
Business Dictionary (2001), www. Business dictionary.com/definition-organizationalperformance.
Carboy J.D., Foo G, Jones L.P., Kinney L.E., and Krupa D.C (1990). Striving for manufacturing excellence at the Denver Works: a summary, AT& T Technical Journal.
Dobson G., Karmakar U.S., and Rummel J. (1998). A Closed loop Automatic Scheduling System. New York: Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms
Enos, D. D. (2007). Performance improvement: Making it Happen. Auerbach Publications, Taylor and Francis Group.
Flores F. (2002), Management and Communication in the office of the Future. A Ph.D Dissertation, University of California.
Groenevelt H. and Hall W.R (2009). Dynamic Kanban system: A case study. Production and Inventory management Journal
Hamond J. H., Dunlop J.T., Abernathy F. A., and Weil D. (1999). A stitch in Time: Lean Retailing and the Transformation of Manufacturing: Lessons from the Textile and Apparel Industries. Oxford University press.
Jaikumar. (2000). The E-Lot System of Manufacture, Working Paper. Harvard Business School.
kanawaty G. (1992), Introduction to work Study. Ilo Office, Geneva.
Karmarter U.S (1991). Lot sizes, Manufacturing lead times and Throughput. Management Science
Karmarker U.S and Shivadasani I.M (2008). Alternatives for Batch Manufacturing Control, New York; Rochester University Press.
Mohamad, N. H., and Said, F. (2010b). Measuring the performance of 100 largest listed companies in Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management
Phillips J. (2008). Quality Control in Project Management. Mc-GrawHill: London.
Richard J.P. Timothy M.D., George S.Y., and Gerry J. (2009). Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best practice. Journal of Management.
Robert B. C (2004), Measuring Organizational Performance: An Exploratory Study. A Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation, University of Georgia
Systemwise Consulting (2009) Washington D.C. http:www.systemwise.co.uk
Wang, Y. and Lo, H. (2003). Customer-focused Performance and the Dynamic Model for Competence Building and Leveraging: A Resource-based View Journal of Management Development,
Watkins, R. (2007a). Designing for performance: aligning your HPT decisions from top to bottom (part 1 of a 3-part series). Performance Improvement Wikipedia (2011) http://www.wikipedia.com.org.performance
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Green Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All journals related to business, management, and accounting can be freely copied, circulated, and reprinted in Green Publication journals, as long as they are duly referenced by original authors. Green Publication follows CC licenses. “A Creative Commons (CC) license is one of the public copyright licenses that allows for the free reuse of an otherwise copyrighted "work." If an author wants to give others the right to publish, use, and build on a work created by the author, he may use a CC license. Green publication use the CC 4.0 license. This license allows anyone to write, remix, tweak, and build on your work, even commercially, as long as the original creation is attributed to you”. This is the most appropriate license available. Recommended for increasing the distribution and use of licensed products.