Are the Private University Students of Bangladesh Satisfied with their University Services? Time to Think

Authors

  • Md Rezwanul Islam Faculty of Business and Law, International University of Malaya-Wales, 50480, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Md Waliur Rahman Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, International University of Malaya-Wales, 50480, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Fahad Ali Gul Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, International University of Malaya-Wales, 50480, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/mce.v3i2.532

Keywords:

Academic services, Access (i.e. database, library), Courses, Student satisfaction, Private University, Bangladesh.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to determine the quality gap of university services in terms of academic services, access to the database and library, courses actually offered by the universities and the students overall satisfaction towards their university services. After the enactment of the Private Universities Act of 1992, Bangladesh experienced a remarkably rapid development in private higher educational institutes over the past two decades. According to a report of the UGC (2013), currently, there are 71 private universities in Bangladesh. But still the services from the universities are not up to the standard. Few of them are now trying to levelling up their standard that they can get competitive advantage but the others are not even thinking about those things for which they can be the top level university in Bangladesh.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashraf, M. (2012), Higher Quality Education in Bangladesh, Lambert, New York, NY.

Alam, M., Haque, M.S. and Siddiqui, S.F. (2007), Private Higher Education in Bangladesh,Research Papers IIEP, International Institute for Education Planning (IIEP), Paris.

UGC (2013), UGC Report, UGC, Dhaka.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. (1988), “SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scalefor measuring consumer perceptions of service quality”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64 No. 1,pp. 12-40.

Jain, S.K. and Gupta, G. (2004), “Measuring service quality SERVQUAL vs SERVPERF scales”,Vikalpa, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 25-37.

Abdullah, F. (2006c). The development of HEdPERF: a new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol.30 (No.6), pp.569-581.

Al-Busaidi, K. (2012), “The payoff of corporate portal usage in an academic institution”, Campus-Wide Information Systems, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 368-379.

Appleton-Knapp, S.L. and Krentler, K.A. (2006), “Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: the importance of managing student expectations”, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 254-64.

Brown, B., Kaldenberg, D., Browne, W., and Brown, D., (1998) “Student as customers: factors affecting satisfaction and assessments of institutional quality”, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8 (3), pp. 1-14.

Butt, B.Z. and Rehman, K.U. (2010), “A study examining the students satisfaction in higher education”, Procedia –Social and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 5446-5450.

Gruber, T., Fuß, S., Voss, R. and Gläser-Ziduka, M. (2010), “Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: using a new measurement tool”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 105-123.

Hayes, B. (1997), Measuring Customer Satisfaction: Survey Design, Use, and Statistical Analysis Methods, ASQ, Milwaukee, WI.

Hemsley-Brown, J. and Oplatka, I. (2006), “Universities in a competitive global marketplace: a systematic review of the literature on higher education marketing”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 316-338.

Hofstede, G. (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations, Sage Publications, London.

K. Selvarajah T. Krishnan et al., (2016), The Effect of Communication on Foreign Student’s Enrolment in Malaysian Higher Learning Institution International Journal of Advanced and Multidisciplinary Social Science 2016, 2(2): 47-50, DOI: 10.5923/j.jamss.20160202.03.

Keedy, J. (2005), “Reconciling the theory and practice schism in educational administration through practitioner-developed theories in practice”, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 134-53.

Kotler, P. and Keller, K. (2012), Marketing Management, Prentice Hall, NJ.

Masrek, M.N. (2007), “Measuring campus portal effectiveness and the contributing factors”, Campus Wide Information Systems, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 342-354.

Mulkeen, T. and Cambron-McCabe, N. (1994), “Educating leaders to invent tomorrow’s school”, in Mulkeen, T., Cambron-McCabe, N. and Anderson, B.G. (Eds), Democratic Leadership: The Changing Context of Administrative Preparation, Alex, Norwood, NJ.

Murphy, J. and Hallinger, P. (Eds.) (1987), Approaches to Administrative Training in Education, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.

Naidoo, V. (2006), ‘‘International education, a tertiary level update’’, Journal of Research inInternational Education, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 323-45.

Saunders, E.S. (2008), “Drilling the LibQUALþs data for strategic planning”, Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 160-70.

Sultan, P. and Wong, H.Y. (2013), “Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context: a qualitative research approach”, Quality Assurance in Education, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 70-95.

Telford, R., & Masson, R. (2005). The congruence of quality values in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, Vol.13 (No.2), pp.107-119.

Trivellas, P. and Geraki, A. (2008), “Investigating principals’ leadership profile in secondary education”, Proceedings of ICMMS 2008 International Conference on Management and Marketing Sciences, Imperial College Press Conference Proceedings, Athens, 23-25 May, pp. 599-602.

Ugboma, C., Ogwude, I.C., Ugboma, O. and Nadi, K. (2007), “Service quality and satisfaction measurements in Nigerian ports: an exploration”, Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 34 No. 4. pp. 331-346.

Moogan, Y., Baron, S. and Harris, K. (1999), “Decision-making behaviour of potential highereducation students”, Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 211-28.

Dawes, P. and Brown, J. (2003), “Factors affecting the size of the awareness, consideration andchoice sets: a study of UK undergraduate students choosing a university”, Working PaperSeries WP001/03, Wolverhampton University, Wolverhampton.

Whitehead, J., Raffan, J. and Deaney, R. (2006), “University choice: what influences the decisionsof academically successful post-16 students?” Higher Education Quarterly, Vol. 60 No. 1,pp. 4-26.

BBC (2006), “Student debt averages £13,252”, BBC News.

Gronroos, C.A. (1978), “Service-oriented approach to marketing of services”, European Journal ofMarketing, Vol. 2 No. 8, pp. 588-601.

Berry, L. (1980), “Services marketing is different”, Business, May/June, pp. 24-30.Blackwell, R., Miniard, P. and Engel, J. (2006), Consumer Behaviour, Thomson South-Western,Mason, OH.

Booms, B. and Bitner, M. (1981), “Marketing strategies and organisation structures for servicefirms”, in Donnelly, J. and George, W. (Eds), Marketing of Services, American MarketingAssociation, Chicago, IL.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-28

How to Cite

Islam, M. R., Rahman, M. W., & Ali Gul, F. (2017). Are the Private University Students of Bangladesh Satisfied with their University Services? Time to Think. International Journal For Research In Mechanical & Civil Engineering, 3(2), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.53555/mce.v3i2.532