Assessing the Impacts of Anxiety and Gender on Student Attitudes Toward Computer Learning Technology in a Saudi Nursing Academic Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/hsn.v1i1.901Keywords:
Assessing, Impacts, Anxiety, Gender, Student, Attitudes, toward, Computer, Learning, Technology, Saudi, Nursing, Academic, EnvironmentAbstract
Computer knowledge and skills are becoming essential components technology in nursing education. Saudi nurses must be prepared to utilize these technologies for the advancement of science and nursing practice in local and global communities. Little attention has been directed to students’ attitudes about computer usage in academic communities in Saudi Arabia. Their attitudes about the use of computers for the enhancement of learning are relatively unknown. Few research studies have been identified that explicate Saudi Arabian nursing students’ attitudes toward computer usage for the acquisition of knowledge and skills. Males and females matriculate at King Saud University (KSU), but attend classes in gender-specific groups. This descriptive correlation study will contribute to the body of knowledge related to nursing students’ attitudes toward computer usage in their baccalaureate education at KSU. The research included all students enrolled in the College of Nursing at KSU in Riyadh, in the summer semester of the academic year 2009-2010. The total number of undergraduate nursing students were 600; 195 were males and 405 were females (KSU, 2008). The findings (n = 335; nm= 133 & nf = 222) suggest that females were more anxious about computer usage (Mean=31.5; 32.7) than males. None of the independent variables explained the variance in the dependent variable, computer usage. Findings did indicate that students had less anxiety if they had access to a computer at home or at school; their anxiety was even less if they had computer exposure at both home and school. Implications of these findings are presented with regard to educating future nurses at KSU for complex roles in health care systems. The study also raises issues about the possibility of planning intervention studies for future research about computer learning, possibly using simulation-based approaches and virtual systems. Issues regarding gender, socioeconomic status, age, learner attitudes, and other variables will need to be systematically investigated. Future studies should assist with the unraveling of traditional cultural issues, including gender-specific roles and expectations for
computer usage in nursing and health care delivery.
Downloads
References
Abanmie, A. (2002). Attitudes of high school students in Saudi Arabia toward computers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University).
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Philippines.
Al-Farsi, F. (2001). Modernity and tradition: The Saudi equation. Knight Communication Ltd. UK.
Alsebail, A. (2004). The College of Education students’ attitudes toward computers at King Saud University (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio University).
Burger, A., & Blignaut, P. (2004). A computer literacy course may initially be detrimental to students’ attitudes towards computers. Proceedings of SAICSIT, 10-14.
Chin, K. (2001). Attitudes of Taiwanese nontraditional commercial institute students toward computers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of SouthDakota, Vermillion).120
Colley, A. M., Gale, M., & Harris, T. A. (1994). Effects of gender role identity and experience on computer attitudes components. Journal of Educational ComputingResearch. 10(2), 129-137.
Forcier, R. C. (1996). The computer as productivity tool in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Francis, L., Katz, Y., & Jones, H. (2000). The reliability and validity of the Hebrew version of the Computer Attitude Scale. Computers & Education, 35, 149-159.
Freedman, K., & Liu, M. (1996). The importance of computer experience, learning processes, and communication patterns in multicultural networking. EducationalTechnology Research and Development,44(1), 43-59.
Hass, A., Tulley, C., & Blair, K. (2002). Mentors versus masters: Women’s and girls’ narratives of (re)negotiation in web-based writing spaces. Computers andComposition, 19, 231-249.
Henrion, C. (1997). Women in mathematics: The addition ofdifference. Indiana University Press.
Kay, R. H. (1992a). Gender differences in computer attitudes, literacy, locus of control and commitment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 21(3), 307-316.
Kilbridge, P., & Classen, D. (2008). The informatics opportunities at the intersection of patient safety and clinical informatics. Journal of the American MedicalInformatics Association, 15(4), 397-407.
King, J., Bond, T., & S. Blanford. (2002). An investigation of computer anxiety by gender and grade. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 69-84.King Saud University (KSU). http://www.ksu.edu.sa
Loyd, B. H., & Loyd, D. F. (1985). Reliability and factorial validity of Computer Attitude Scale. Educational Psychological Measurement, 44(2), 501-505.
Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. P. (1987). Gender and computer experience of teachers as a factors in computer attitudes of middle school students. Journal of EarlyAdolescence, 7(1), 13-19.
McLaughlin, S., Fitch, M., Goyal, D., Hayden, E., Kauh, C., Laack, T., Nowicki, T., Okuda, Y., Palm, K., Pozner, C., Vozenilek, J., Wang, W., Gordon, J., (2008). Simulation in graduate medical education. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 1117–1129.
Merriam-Webster's medical desk dictionary. (2007). Merriam-Webster's medical desk dictionary (Revised ed.). Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. New York: NY.
Moshaikeh, M. (1992). Implementing educational technology in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Instructional Media, 19(1), 65-70.
Mufti, M. (2002). A case from a community and hospital-based long-term care facilities in Saudi Arabia. Annals of Saudi Medicine, 22(5-6), 336-338.
Oblinger, D. G., & Rush, S. C. (Eds.). (1997). The learning revolution: The challenge of information technology in academy. Boston, MA: Anker.
Okebukola, P. A. (1993). The gender factor in computer anxiety and interest among some Australian high school students. Educational Research, 35(2), 181-189.
Otomo, Y. (1998). The relationship of computer anxiety, mathematics anxiety, test anxiety, gender and demographic characteristics among community college students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(6A), 957A.Saudi Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). http://www.mohe.gov.sa
Scarpa, R., Smeltzer, S. C., & Jasion, B. (1992). Attitudes of nurses toward computerization: A replication. Computers in Nursing, 10, 72-80.
Siann, G, Macleod, H., Glissov, P., Durnel, A. (1990). The effect of computer use on gender differences in attitudes to computers. Computers in Education, 14, 183-191.
Statistical Package for the Social Sciencesfor Windows, Rel. 18.0.1. [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.Teo, T. S. H., & Lim, V. K. G. (1996). Factors influencing personal computer usage: The gender gap. Women in Management Review, 11, 18-26.
Tumulty, G. (2001). Professional development of nursing in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 285-290.
Young, J. (1997). Invasion of laptops: More colleges adopt mandatory computing programs. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(15), 433-475
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in
