H Impact of Instructor Versus Student Facilitator Debriefing Following Clinical Simulation Sessions on Nursing students’ Self-Efficacy, Satisfaction, and Achievement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/hsn.v5i2.822Keywords:
Debriefing, facilitator, Self-efficacy, Satisfaction, SimulationAbstract
Debriefing is an effective educational tool commonly used with adult learning following simulated session. A comparative interventional design was utilized to compare the impact of instructor versus student facilitator debriefing following clinical simulation sessions on nursing students’ self-efficacy, satisfaction, and achievement. A convenience sample of 151 nursing students enrolled in community nursing and obstetrics and gynecological nursing courses according to the curriculum plan in the Faculty of Nursing at Alexandria University, Egypt participated in the study. Students went through a debriefing process by both instructor and students during two simulation sessions. General perceived self-efficacy scale, satisfaction with simulation experience scale and students’ achievement records were used for data collection. Results revealed no statistically significant difference between the effect of debriefing done by instructors or students on their perceived self-efficacy, satisfaction with simulation experience and their clinical performance among neither obstetrics nor community nursing groups during first as well as second simulation sessions. The study concluded that the role of both instructor and student facilitator should be considered in a debriefing following nursing simulation experience and their active contribution to the learning process. Further researches are recommended to investigate the potential for using the self-debriefing method to enhance the efficiency of simulation-based education.
Downloads
References
Dreifuerst K. The essentials of debriefing in Simulation Learning:AConcept Analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives. March / April 2009;30 (2): 109-114
Shinnick M & Tamara B. Debriefing: The Most Important Component in Simulation? Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2011; 7 ( 3) :1 05-1113.
Harvey P & Radomski N .Debriefing learners in simulation.North West rural medical education unit. September 2015; (30)
Shore H. After compression, time for decompression: debriefing after significant clinical events. Infant 2014; 10(4): 117-19.
Belote & Marisa J. A comparative evaluation of the learner-centeredgrading debriefing method in nursing education. (2015); Graduate Theses and Dissertation: University of South Floridahttp://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5643
Coutinho V, Martins J, Pereira F. Structured debriefing in nursing simulation: students’ perceptions. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2016; 6 (9): 127-134
Overstreet M. The current practice of nursing clinical simulation debriefing: A multiple case study. 2009; (Dissertation). Knoxville: University of Tennessee.
Cooper S & Cant R. The benefits of debriefing as formative feedback in nurse education. Australian journalof advanced nursing. 2010; 29 (1): 37-47
Pivec J & Renee C, "Debriefing after Simulation: Guidelines for faculty and students" (2011); Master of Arts in Nursing Theses.St. Catherine University Paper 14.
Ahmed M, Sevdalis N, Paige J, Gururaja R, Nestel D, Arora S .Identifying best practice guidelines for debriefing in surgery: a tri-continental study. The American Journal of surgery. April 2012; 203 ( 4): 523–529
Persico ,Lori, "A comparison of two debriefing methods on clinical reasoning outcomes, learner satisfaction with debriefing and reflection, clinical learning and clinical reasoning, and psychological safety of nurse orienteesin simulation-based education" (2017); Theses & Dissertations. Molloy College 59. http://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/etd/59
Schwarze R. & Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs .(1995); (pp. 35-37). Windsor, UK: NFER-NELSON.
Schwarzer R & Jerusalem M.General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE).Measurement Instrument Database for the SocialScience. (2013); Retrieved from www.midss.ie
Levett-Jones T,McCoy M,Lapkin S,Noble D,Hoffman K,Dempsey J,Arthur C&Roche J. 2011 .The development and psychometric testing of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. Nurse Educ Today;31(7):705-10
ZigmontJ, Kappus J,Sudikoff N. The 3D model of debriefing: defusing, discovering, and deepening. Seminars in perinatology. 2011; 35(2):52-58
Aebersold M. The History of Simulation and Its Impact on the Future. AACN Adv Crit Care.2016; 27(1):56-61.
Wallace D, Moughrabi S. The efficacy of simulation debriefing in developing critical thinking in accelerated baccalaureate nursing students Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 2016; 6 (5) :13-8.
Loo M,Krishnasamy C,Lim W. Considering face, rights, and goals: a critical review of rapport management in facilitator-guided simulationdebriefingapproaches. Simul Health c.Feb2018; 13(1):52-60.
Boet S, Bould MD, Bruppacher HR, Desjardins F, Chandra DB, Naik VN. Looking in the mirror: self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises.Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1377-81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eb8be.
OikawaS,BergB,TurbanJ,VincentD, MandaiY, and Birkmire-PetersD.Self-Debriefing vs Instructor Debriefing in a Pre-Internship Simulation Curriculum: Night on Call. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2016 May; 75(5): 127–132.
RohYS ,Kelly M, Ha EH. 2016 Comparisonof instructor‐led versus peer‐led debriefing in nursing students. Nursing &Health sciencesVolume18,Issue2June 2016 Pages238-245
RohS ,HaEH K)2016(. Comparisonof instructor ledversus peer leddebriefing in nursing students. Nursing &Health sciences .18(2):238-245
Tuttle, Rosalie E., 2009"The Impact of Simulation in Nursing Education on the Self-Efficacy and Learner Satisfaction of Nursing Students". Faculty Scholarship -Nursing. Paper 3. http://digitalcommons.olivet.edu/nurs_facp/3
Ashley G. "Nursing Simulation Experience: Self-Efficacy, State Anxiety, Locus of Control, and Simulation Effectiveness. 2013; Honors Theses and Capstones. 137. https://scholars.unh.edu/honors/137
Shinnick M. & Woo M. Does nursing student self-efficacy correlate with knowledge when using human patient simulation? Clinical simulation in nursing. February 2014;10 (2): e71-e79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2013.07.006
Fanning RM, Gaba DM. The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning.Simul Healthc. 2007 Summer;2(2):115-25. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539.
K. Page-Cutrara, M. Turk. Impact of prebriefingon competency performance, clinical judgment andexperience in simulation: An experimental study Nurse Education Today 48 (2017) 78–83.
Shea, Kathleen L., "The Effect of Simulation with Debriefing for Meaningful Learning in Courses of Nursing Theory and Practicum on Student Knowledge and Perception of Instruction" (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 299. https://repository.usfca.edu/diss/299
Valerie J. Shute. Focus on Formative Feedback, March 2007 RR-07-11.30.Draycott, T.J., Crofts, J.F., Ash, J.P., Wilson, L.V., Yard, E., Sibanda, T., Whitelaw, A. 2008. Improving neonataloutcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 112(1):14-20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal For Research In Health Sciences And Nursing (ISSN: 2208-2670)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in
