A NON-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY TO ASSESS THE LEVEL OF PERCEPTION, PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION TOWARDS ONLINE LEARNING DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC AMONG UNDERGRADUATE PHYSIOTHERAPY STUDENTS IN EMAAR GREENS, JAIPUR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/hsn.v8i12.2173Keywords:
Online learning, perception, performance, satisfaction, undergraduate physiotherapy students, COVID-19 pandemicAbstract
E-learning plays a vital role in this current scenario among students across the globe. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of perception, performance and satisfaction regarding online learning during Covid-19 pandemic among undergraduate physiotherapy students. A quantitative approach with a non-experimental descriptive research design with 60 undergraduate physiotherapy students were recruited as study participants using a non-probability sampling technique for this study.
According to the research study conducted by Abbasi Maria S. in 2020 stated that E-learning satisfaction levels were better among developed countries (7.34) compared to developing countries (5.82). The majority of participants agreed that E-learning was satisfactory in acquiring knowledge, however not effective in acquiring clinical and technical skills. As the COVID-19 lockdown eases, there is a need for improvement in the methods employed in E-learning and more blended learning among healthcare students is recommended.
Data were collected using a self-structured questionnaire both for demographic information and to assess their level of perception, performance and satisfaction with online learning. The result of this study showed that the majority (50%) of the 30 physiotherapy students were between the ages of 19 and 20. By gender, 39 (65%) were women. In terms of religion, 38 (63.3%) were Hindu. 42 (60%) of them in the Bachelor of Physiotherapy program were in their junior year. Regarding prior information, 36 (60%) received updates via social media. It has also found that the current Level of Awareness, Performance and Satisfaction of Physiotherapy Students with Online Learning 7%) were found to have moderate awareness. Low awareness, 8 people (13.3%) had high awareness. Current online learning outcomes were 44 (73.3%) fair, 13 (21.7%) good and 3 (5%)) bad. Current satisfaction results showed that 44 people (73.3%) were moderately satisfied with online learning, 12 people (20%) were very satisfied, and 4 people (6.7%) were not satisfied.
For this study, the mean score and standard deviation of current level of perception, performance and satisfaction with online learning among undergraduate physiotherapy students were 31.28±6.27, 33.20±5.54,33.35±6.29 with a minimum score of 14.0, 15.0 and 10.0, maximum score 43.0, 50.0 and 50.0.
Furthermore, it has also showed that the association between current level of perception, performance and satisfaction with online learning among undergraduate physiotherapy students with their selected demographic variables None of the demographic variables showed a statistically significant relationship with current level of perception, performance and satisfaction with online learning among undergraduate physiotherapy students. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of perception, performance and satisfaction regarding online learning among undergraduate physiotherapy students during covid-19 pandemic in Emaar Greens, Jaipur. Therefore, it was concluded that the current level of perception and satisfaction was average with fair performance towards online learning among undergraduate physiotherapy students.
Downloads
References
Bączek M, Zagańczyk-Bączek M, Szpringer M, Jaroszyński A, Wożakowska-Kapłon B. Students’ perception of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey study of Polish medical students. Medicine 2021;100(7).
Hodges C, Moore S, Lockee B, Trust T, Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause review 2020;27:1-12.
Liyanagunawardena TR. Measuring student perception and actual usage of online learning physiotheraphy system. Communications of the IBIMA 2008;4(21):165-168
Howard C, Boettcher JV, Justice L, Schenk KD, Rogers PL, Berg GA. (Eds.). Encyclopedia of distance learning. IGI Global 2005
Himat AN, Takal MH, Hakimi MF. Afghan Students ‘satisfaction from Online Learning During Covid-19 At Kandahar University, Kandahar, Afghanistan. American International Journal of Social Science Research 2021;6(1):16-29.
Su B, Bonk CJ, Magjuka RJ, Liu X, Lee SH. The importance of interaction in web-based education: A program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning 2005;4(1):1-19.
Syauqi K, Munadi S, Triyono MB. Students' Perceptions toward Vocational Education on Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education 2020;9(4):881-886.
Stephan M, Markus S, Gläser-Zikuda M. (, October). Students' achievement emotions and online learning in teacher education. In Frontiers in Education Frontiers 2019;4:109
Xu J, Chen L, Ren S. Online learning for offloading and autoscaling in energy harvesting mobile edge computing. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking 2017;3(3):361-373.
Wang K, Zhang L, Ye L. A nationwide survey of online teaching strategies in dental education in China. Journal of dental education 2021;85(2):128-134.
Dhawan S. Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2020;49(1):5-22.
Paudel J. Effectiveness of Online Education in Nepalese Context.
Alhumaid K, Ali S, Waheed A, Zahid E, Habes M. COVID-19 & Elearning: Perceptions &Attitudes Of Teachers Towards E-Learning Acceptancein The Developing Countries. Multicultural Education 2020;6(2)
Stansfield M, McLellan E, Connolly T. Enhancing student performance in online learning and traditional face-to-face class delivery. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research 2004;3(1):173-188
Oducado RM, Estoque H. Online Learning in Physiotheraphy Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Stress, Satisfaction, and Academic Performance. Journal Of Physiotheraphy Practice 2021;4(2):143-153. 16.
Surahman E. (, October). Student Satisfaction toward Quality of Online Learning in Indonesian Higher Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic. In 2020 6th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET). IEEE 2020, 120-125
S. Bali1 and M C Liu (2019), Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing, Issue 1088, pp. 3-8
T. Muthuprasad ,S. Aiswarya K.S. Aditya, Girish K. Jha, Students’ perception and preference for online education in India during COVID -19 pandemic 2021, Vol. 3 Issue 1, Social Science and Humanities Open, Elesiver Publisher, pp. 10.18
Abbasi, Maria S., Ahmed Naseer, Sajjad Batool, E-Learning perception and satisfaction among health sciences students amid the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Vol. 67, Issue 3, Journal of work, pp. 549-556.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal For Research In Health Sciences And Nursing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in
