Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Older than One Year Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/ans.v7i2.1524Keywords:
Probing, Congenital, Nasolacrimal, ObstructionAbstract
Tear duct probing and irrigation is a procedure used in the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The success rate of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 1 year of age Hospital based cross—sectional observational study. The study was performed in Nangarhar university teaching hospital within a seventh months study duration. A retrospective study was done of consecutive children undergoing probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The children who had bilateral Nasolacrimal obstruction, just one eye was included in the study. The study period was from 1stjune 2020 up-to 1stDecember 2020. A total of 56 children undergoing probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Right eye involvement was present in 22 (39.29%) cases and left eye in 34 (60.71%) cases. The children were divided into two groups. Group 1 (1 – 2 years) and group 2 (>2 years). The mean age of children in group I was 19.45 ± 3.68 months and in group ii. 32.71 ± 17.04 months. There were 42 male and 14 female children. The success rate in group I was 89.29% and in group II. 87.57%. failure was more in group II (21.43%) as compared to group I (10.71%). Probing is highly successful in the older age group (78.57%) and should remain the first line of treatment in older children.
Downloads
References
B. Piest KL, katowitz JA. Treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology clinics of north America 1991;4;201-9.
C. Robb RM. congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction ophthalmology clinics of north America 2001;14;443-6.
D. Kerstein RC. Congenital lacrimal abnormalities in principles and practice of ophthalmic plastic and Reconstructive surgery. W B Saunnders company; 1996. Vol 2 p 731 – 47.
E. James DH MacEwen CJ. Managing congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in general practice. British Medical journal 1997;315;293- 6.
F. Honavar S, Vasudha EP, Rao GN. Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children Am J ophthalmol 2000; 130; 42-8.
G. Robb RM. Success rates of Nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Am J ophthalmol 1998;105;1307 – 10.
H. Mannor GE, Rose GE K wabena FA, Eric Ezra. factors affecting the success rate of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction Am J ophthalmol. 1999; 127;616-7.
I. Katowitz JA. Welsh MG. timing of initial probing and irrigation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmology 1987;94;698;705.
J. Stager D baker JD, Frey T, weakley Dr Jr, Birch EE. office probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction ophthalmic surg 1992;23;482-4.
K. Kushner BJ, management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children between 18 month and 4 years old. J-AAPOS 1998;2;57-60.
L. Mansoury Ej. Calhoun JH. Nelson LB, Harley RD. results of late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. ophthalmic surg 1986;93;1052-4.
M. Havins HE. Wilkins RB. A useful alternative to silicone intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions. Ophthalmic surg 1983;14;660-70.
N. Al-Hussain H.Nasr AM, Silastic intubation in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction; a study of 14 eyes. Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery 1993;9;32-7.
O. MacEwen CJ, young JDH. Epiphora during the first year of life. eye 1991;5;596-600.
P. Zwaan J. the anatomy of probing and irrigation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmic surg lasers 1997;28;71-3.
Q. Kashkouli MB Beigi B, parvaresh MM, kassaee. A, Tabatbaee Z.late and very late initial probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction ; what is the cause of failure ? Br J ophthalmol 2003;87;1151.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal For Research In Applied And Natural Science (ISSN: 2208-2085)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in