Cranio-Cerebral Gunshot Wounds to the Head

Authors

  • Samsoor Walizada Lecturer of Neurosurgery Department, Medical Faculty, Nangarhar University, Jalalabad, Afghanistan
  • Naqibullah Hadi Lecturer of Ped Surgery Department, Medical Faculty, Nangarhar University, Jalalabad, Afghanistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/ans.v7i1.1499

Keywords:

Cranio-cerebral gunshot wounds (CCGW), high velocity bullets, neuronal damage, cavitation, DAI lesions

Abstract

 Cranio-cerebral gunshots wounds (CCGW) are the most devastating injuries to the central nervous system, especially made by high velocity bullets, the most devastating, severe and usually fatal type of missile injury to the head. The Objective of this article is   to investigate and compare, using a retrospective study on Ten cases the clinical outcomes of CCGW. Predictors of poor outcome were: older age, delayed mode of transportation, low admission CGS score with hemodynamic instability, CT visualization of diffuse brain damage, bi-hemispheric, multi-lobar injuries with lateral and midline sagittal planes trajectories made by penetrating high velocity bullets fired from a very close range, brain stem and ventricular injury with intraventricular and/or subarachnoid hemorrhage, mass effect and midline shift, evidence of herniation and/or hematomas, high ICP and/or hypotension, abnormal coagulation states on admission or disseminated intravascular coagulation. Less harmful effects were generated by retained missiles, bone fragments with CNS infection, DAI lesions and neuronal damages associated to cavitation, seizures.  10 patients (8 male and 2 female), age ranged 22-65 years, with CCGW, during the period 2018-2019, caused by military conflict and accidental firing. After initial resuscitation all patients were assessed on admission by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). After investigations: X-ray skull, brain CT, Angio-CT, cerebral MRI, SPECT; baseline investigations, neurological, hemodynamic and coagulability status all patients underwent surgical treatment following emergency intervention. The survival, mortality and functional outcome were evaluated by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score. As result, referring on 10 cases we evaluate on a retrospective study the clinical outcome, Imagistics, microscopic studies on neuronal and axonal damage generated by temporary cavitation along the cerebral bullet’s track, therapeutics, as the review of the literature. 4 patients with an admission CGS 9 and 10 survived and 6 patients with admission CGS score of 3, with severe ventricular, brain stem injuries and lateral plane of high velocity bullets trajectories died despite treatment. As conclusion, CCGW is the most devastating type of missile injury to the head. Aggressive intensive care management in combination with early management with less aggressive meticulous neurosurgical technique, has significantly reduced the mortality and morbidity associated with these injuries, but they still remain unacceptably high. Primary prevention of these injuries remains important, the patient must be monitored closely for possible complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Federico C Vinas - Penetrating Head Trauma: Multimedia, May 27, 2009.
2. Antic B., Spaic M. – Penetrating Craniocerebral Injuries from the former Yugoslavia Battlefields, Ind. J. Neurotrauma (IJNT), 2006, 3, 27-30
3. Iacob M., Iacob G. – Plagi craniocerebrale prin arma de foc, Simpozionul de Neurochirurgie Cluj Napoca 1987
4. Shaffrey M.E. et al. - Classification of civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds: a multivariate analysis predictive of mortality, J Neurotrauma. 1992 Mar; 9, Suppl 1:S279-85.
5. Izci Y., Kayali H.,Daneyemez M., Koksel T. – Comparison of clinical outcomes between anteroposterior and lateral penetrating craniocerebral gunshot wounds, Emerg. Med. J. 2005, 22, 409-410
6. Rosenfeld J.V. – Gunshot injury to the head and spine, J. Clin. Neurosci 2002, 9, 9-16
7. Marshall L.F., Marshall S.B., Sean G.M. – Modern neurotraumatology: a brief historical review, in
Youmans Neurological Surgery, Editor: Winn H.R., 5th Edition Saunders, 2004, 5019-5024
8. Spaic M., Branislav A. – The lost race, Indian Journal of Neurotrauma 2009, 6, 1, 1-4
9. Rashid B.A et al. – Analysis of 3794 civilian craniocerebral missile injuries – Results from 20 years of Kashmir conflict, Pan Arab Journal of Neurosurgery, 2010, 14,1, 24-32.
10. Meirowsky A.M. – Secondary removal of retained bone fragments in missile wounds of the brain, J.Neurosurg. 1982, 57, 617-621
11. Bakir A. et al. – High Velocity Gunshot Wounds to the head: analysis of 135 patients, Neurol. Med. Chir (Tokyo) 2005, 45, 281-287
12. Erdogan E., Gonul E., Seber N. – Craniocerebral gunshot wounds, Neurosurg Q. 2002, 12, 1-18
13. Gonul E., Baysefer A., Kahraman S. Et al. – Causes of infections and management results in penetrating craniocerebral injuries, Neurosurg. Rev. 1997, 20, 177181
14. Kaufman H.H. – Civilian gunshot wounds to the head, Neurosurg. 1993, 32, 962-964
15. Karger B. – Penetrating gunshots to the head and lack of immediate incapacitation, Wound ballistics and mechanisms of incapacitation, Int. J. Legal Med. 1995, 108,(2), 53-61
16. Kim K.A., Wang M.Y., McNatt S.A. et al. - Vector Analysis Correlating Bullet Trajectory to Outcome after Civilian Through-and-Through Gunshot Wound to the Head: Using Imaging Cues to Predict Fatal Outcome, Neurosurgery, 2005: 737-747
17. Oehmichen M., Meissner C., Konig H.G., Gehl H. R. – Gunshot injuries to the head and brain caused by low velocity handguns and rifles; A. review, Forensic science international, Congrès European Congress of Neuropathology No7, Helsinki, Finlande, 2004, vol. 146, nr.2-3, 111-120.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-31

How to Cite

Walizada , S., & Hadi, N. (2021). Cranio-Cerebral Gunshot Wounds to the Head. International Journal For Research In Applied And Natural Science, 7(1), 08–13. https://doi.org/10.53555/ans.v7i1.1499

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): International Journal For Research In Applied And Natural Science (ISSN: 2208-2085)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 International Journal For Research In Applied And Natural Science (ISSN: 2208-2085)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.

By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in