Localized Apparatuses in Teaching Electrical Conductivity of Aqueous Solutions

Authors

  • Nieva Jun I. Duya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/ans.v6i5.1293

Keywords:

Localized apparatus, perception of students, and electrical conductivity of aqueous solutions

Abstract

The study sought to determine as to which among the three proposed apparatuses namely: localized aqueous solution lamp, localized aqueous solution mini fan and localized aqueous solution Ferris wheel best demonstrated electrical conductivity of aqueous solutions and its effectiveness. It also sought to find out the perception of students when these localized apparatuses have been utilized in the activity. The respondents of this study were the 123 Grade 7 students of Pantao National High School, school year 2018-2019. The researcher utilized the descriptive method. The researcher also used validated questionnaires that measured the performance and perception of the students. The statistical tool used in the study includes, mean, t-test for independent data, weighted mean, Spearman rank correlation coefficient and ANOVA. The result of the study indicated that the posttest performance of the students did not meet expectationswhereas, their pretest performance was generally in satisfactory level. The marked improvement of their performance was attributed from the utilization of locally made apparatuses. Moreover, the study revealed that the three apparatuses had different effects among the students where, localized aqueous solution lamp had better effect on students, while localized aqueous solution mini fan was as good as miniature Ferris wheel. Further, the extent of perception among students on the utilization of localized apparatuses in terms of motivation, cognition and interaction was high.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, A. M. (2008). Improvisation of instructional materials for the teaching of Biology, an important innovation in the Nigerian educational system. Pristine Journal, 50, 1-7.

Aina, J. K., & Philip, Y. J. (2013). Imperative of environment in science

Aina, K. (2013). Instructional Materials and Improvisation in Physics Class: implication for Teaching and Learning. 10 SR Journal of Research and Method in Education, 2.

Aina, K. J. (2013). Instructional materials and improvisation in physics class: Implications for teaching and learning. Computer, 2(20), 8.

Attle, S., & Baker, B. (2007).Cooperative learning in a competitive environment: Classroom applications. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 19(1).

Bartle, E. (2015, March 16). Retrieved from itali@uq.edu.au.

Bhukuvhani, C., Kusure, L., Munodawafa, V., Sana, A., &Gwizangwe, I. (2010). Pre-service Teachers’ use of improvised and virtual laboratory experimentation in Science teaching. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 6(4), 27-38.

Buccat, R. (2015, August 02). Pinay Scientist creates lamp that runs on salt water Retrieved from ABS-CBNnews.com

Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International journal of science education, 28(11), 1315-1346

Corpuz, B. B., & Salandanan, G. G. (2011). Principles of teaching 1. Quezon City: Lorimar Publishing, Inc.

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb's experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of geography, 99(5), 185-195.

Helmenstine, A. (2018). Electrical Conductivity Definition. ThoughtCo.

Jacobson, W. J., & Bergman, A. (1991). Science for Children A Book for Teachers. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Jain, N., Yang, G., Machatha, S. G., &Yalkowsky, S. H. (2006).Estimation of the aqueous solubility of weak electrolytes. International journal of pharmaceutics, 319(1-2), 169-171.

Jurow, A. S., & Creighton, L. (2005). Improvisational science discourse: Teaching science in two K-1 classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 16(3), 275-297.

Kelly, G. J., Brown, C., & Crawford, T. (2000). Experiments, contingencies, and curriculum: Providing opportunities for learning through improvisation in science teaching. Science Education, 84(5), 624-657.

Kiepe, J., Horstmann, S., Fischer, K., &Gmehling, J. (2004). Application of the PSRK model for systems containing strong electrolytes. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 43(20), 6607-6615.

Killen, R. (2013). Effective Teaching Strategies 6th edition. Australia: Cengage Learning Australia Pty Limited.

Knobloch, N. A. (2003). Is experiential learning authentic?. Journal of Agricultural Education, 44(4), 22-34.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential learning theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. The SAGE handbook of management learning, education and development, 42-68.

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2012).Experiential learning theory.In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1215-1219).Springer, Boston, MA.

Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.

Konak, A., Clark, T. K., &Nasereddin, M. (2014).Using Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle to improve student learning in virtual computer laboratories. Computers & Education, 72, 11-22.

Manolis, C., Burns, D. J., Assudani, R., & Chinta, R. (2012, October). Assessing experiential learning styles: A methodological reconstruction and. SciVerse ScienceDirect, 2-3.

Mboto, F. A., Udo, N. N., & Stephen, U. (2011, January). Effects of Improvised Materials on Student's Achievement and Retention of the Concept of Radioactivity. An Intenational Multi-Disciplinary Journal, Ethopia, 5, 346-347.

McLeod, S. A. (2013). Kolb - Learning Styles. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html

Montebon, D. T. (2014, December). K12 Science Program in the Philippines : Students Perception on It's implementation. International Journal of Education and Research, 2, 154.

Muhammad, R., & Lawal, N. (2015, May 20). Improvisation: an alternative approach to solving the problem of ill-equiped biology and agricultural science laboratories in senior secondary schools, Nigeria. The international Journal of Engineering and Science, 4.

Mulvahill , E. (2018). Understanding Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation in the Classroom. We are Teachers.

Nabavi, R. T. (2012, January). Bandura's Social Learning Theory & Social Cognitive Learning Theory. Research Gate, 5.

Onsanya, S. A., & Omosewo, E. 0. (2011). Effect of Improvised and Standard Instructional Matriials on Secondary School Student's Academic Performance in Physics in Ilorin, Nigeria. Singapore Journal of Scientific Research, 1, 73.

Paunan, R. (2013, March-April). Hands-On Science: How to use Practical Experiments in Class. Educator, 38.

Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., ...& Stringer, L. C. (2010). What is social learning?. Ecology and society, 15(4).

Robinson, R. A., & Stokes, R. H. (2002). Electrolyte solutions. Courier Corporation.

Rozmus, J., de Hemptinne, J. C., Galindo, A., Dufal, S., &Mougin, P. (2013).Modeling of strong electrolytes with ePPC-SAFT up to high temperatures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52(29), 9979-9994.

Santo, A. S., & Plana, E. B. (1972). Sourcebook in Science Teaching in The Philippines. Manila: Centro Escolar University.

The Science Education Institute, Department of Science and Technology and the University of the Philippines National Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development. (2011). Science Framework for Philippine Education.

Tompkins, G. E. (2003). Literacy for the 21st Century. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

UA, U., & WJ, D. (2012). Comparative Study on the Effect of Using Improvised Freefall Apparatus and Bomb Calorimeter in Teaching the Concept of Enthalpy in Nigeria Senior Secondary School Chemistry. World Journal of Young Researcher.

UNESCO Education Sector. (n.d.). Current Challenges in Basic Science Education. Paris, France.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Duya, N. J. I. (2020). Localized Apparatuses in Teaching Electrical Conductivity of Aqueous Solutions. International Journal For Research In Applied And Natural Science, 6(5), 23–55. https://doi.org/10.53555/ans.v6i5.1293