The Role MCDM or MCDA Approaches in Criteria Decisions

Authors

  • Naser Al-Dori Department of Mathematical, University of North Maraca, Morocco
  • Ferank Kertin Department of Mathematica, University of North Maraca, Morocco
  • Fabio Casatio Department of Mathematical, University of North Maraca, Morocco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/ms.v2i1.242

Keywords:

Multiple-criteria decision, AHP,, P, Criteria Decisions, Multi evaluation decision, MCDM

Abstract

The difficulty of the problem originates from the presence of more than one criterion. There is no longer a unique optimal solution to an MCDM problem that can be obtained without incorporating preference information. The conventional methods for selection are inadequate for dealing with the imprecise or vague nature of linguistic assessment. To overcome this difficulty, multicriteria decision-making methods are  proposed. The aim of this study is to use analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the technique for order  preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) methods for Multi-criteria evaluation decision. It is unusual that the cheapest car is the most comfortable and the safest one. In portfolio management, we are interested in getting high returns but at the same time reducing our risks. This paper presents a comparison of MCDM and MCDA in mine case study.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

EK. Aleksandrovskaya, and VP. Urakhchin, Prediction of the displacements of concrete gravity dams on rock foundations, Power Technology and Engineering (formerly Hydrotechnical Construction) 8, 419-427 (1974).

CR. Allen, and LS. Cluff, Active faults in dam foundations: an update, Proc. 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand (2000).

M. Wieland, R.P. Brenner, and P. Sommer, Earthquake resilience of large concrete dams: Damage, repair, and strengthening concepts, Trans. 21st Int. Congress on Large Dams, Montreal 131-150 (2003).

J. Mata, and E. Portela, Application of neural networks to dam safety control, 5the International Conference on Dam Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal (2007).

M. Mokhtari, H. Alinejad-Rokny, H. Jalalifar, Selection of the Best Well Control System by Using Fuzzy MultipleAttribute Decision-Making Methods, Journal of Applied Statistics, 41(5): 1105-1121 (2014).

M. Wieland, and P. Brenner, Potentially active faults in the foundations of large dams part I: Vulnerability of dams TO seismic movements in dam foundation, Proc. 14th World Conf. On Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, (2008).

N. Seyedaghaee, S. Rahati, H. Alinejad-Rokny and F. Rouhi, An Optimized Model for the University Strategic Planning, International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 2(5): 500-505 (2013).

YS. Kim, and B. Kim, Prediction of relative crest settlement of concrete-faced rockfill dams analyzed using an artificial neural network model, Computers and Geotechnics 35, 313-322 (2008).

J. Mata, Interpretation of concrete dam behavior with artificial neural network and multiple linear regression models, Engineering Structures 33, 903-910 (2011).

H. Kamali-Bandpey, H. Alinejad-Rokny, H. Khanbabapour, F. Rashidinejad, Optimization of Firing System Utilizing Fuzzy Madm Method-Case study: Gravel Mine Project in Gotvand Olya Dam-Iran, Australian Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 5(12): 1089-1097 (2011).

S Adnani, F Sereshki, H Alinejad-Rokny, H Kamali-Bandpey, Selection of Temporary Ventilation System for Long Tunnels by Fuzzy Multi Attributes Decision Making Technique (Fuzzy-Madm), Case Study: Karaj Water Conveyance Tunnel (Part Et-K′) in Iran, American Journal of Scientific Research, 29: 83-91, (2011).

F. Chan, Integration of Expert System with Analysis Hierarchy Process for the Design of Material Handling Selection System, The Journal of Material Processing Technology 32, 137-145 (2001).

O. Kulak, Multi-Attribute Material Handling Equipment Selection Using Information Axiom, the Third International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Seoul 24-24 (2004).

S. Chakraborthy, Design of Material Handling Equipment Selection Model Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing 28, 1237-1245 (2006).

A. Reza Fazli, M. Eghbali Asli, H. Alinejad-Rokny, Improving Security of Audio Watermarking in Image using Selector Keys, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(11): 1545-1549 (2012).

A. Aghajani, and M. Akbarpour, Optimizing Loading System of Gol-e-Gohar Iron Ore Mine of Iran by Genetic Algorithm, Iron Ore Conference, Australia 55-63 (2007).

AT. Gumus, Evaluation of Hazardous Waste Transportation Firms by Using a Two Step Fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS Methodology, Expert Systems with Applications 36, 4067-4074 (2009).

I. Alavi, A. Akbari, H. Alinejad-Rokny, Plant Type Selection for Reclamation of Sarcheshmeh Copper Mine by Fuzzy-TOPSIS Method, Advanced Engineering Technology and Application, 1(1): 8-13 (2012).

A. Bascetin, An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Equipment Selection at Orhaneli Open Pit Coal Mine, Mining Technology (Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. A) 113, A192-A199 (2004).

G. Enea, and G. Galante, An Integrated Approach to the Facilities and Material Handling System Design, International Journal of Production Research 40, 4007-4017 (2002).

N. Celebi, An Equipment Selection and Cost Analysis System for Open Pit Coal Mines, International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment 12, 181-187 (1998).

D. Denby, and D. Schofield, Application of Expert Systems in Equipment Selection for Surface Design,

International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment 4, 165-171 (1990).

S. Bandopadhyay, and P. Venkatasubramanian, Expert Systems as Decision Aid in Surface Mine Equipment Election, International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment 1, 159-165 (1987).

N. Seyedaghaee, S. Rahati, H. Alinejad-Rokny, F. Rouhi, An Optimized Model for the University Strategic Planning, International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 2(5): 500-505 (2013).

S. Anon, Belt Conveyors for Bulk Materials. Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association, 5the International Conference on Dam Engineering, Lisbon (2007).

Y. Chang, Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP, European Journal of Operational Research 95, 649-655 (1996).

L. Zare, and M. Ataei, The Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) Approach to Selection of Optimum Underground Mining Method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Expert Systems With Applications 36, 8218-8226 (2009).

Downloads

Published

2016-01-31

How to Cite

Al-Dori, N., Kertin, F., & Casatio, F. (2016). The Role MCDM or MCDA Approaches in Criteria Decisions. International Journal For Research In Mathematics And Statistics, 2(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.53555/ms.v2i1.242