Dispersion and Storage Coefficient Influence on Accumulation of Frankia Transport in Heterogeneous Silty and Fine Sand Formation, Warri, Delta State of Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/mce.v4i4.380Keywords:
Dispersion, storage coefficients frankia, heterogeneous formationAbstract
The study of frankia transport pressured by dispersion and storage coefficient has been thoroughly expressed. The study has monitored the deposition of frankia in silty and fine sand formation. The developed model has express the behaviour of frankia in the study location, storage coefficient and dispersions were observed to pressure the behaviour of the contaminant as expressed in graphical representation, the fluctuation of concentration reflect the influences from porosity variation thus dispersion and storage coefficient, this generated slight accumulation of frankia in silty and fine sand formation, this condition were examined through the rate of its deposition base on some fluctuation experienced that could not monitor the detail deposition of frankia transport in silty and fine sand formation, slight heterogeneous setting in the formation were also observed, the developed model were compared with other experimental values, and both parameters expressed favourable fits validating the model.
Downloads
References
Katherine C. Goldfarb1†, Ulas Karaoz1, China A. Hanson2, Clark A. Santee1, Mark A. Bradford3, KathleenK. Treseder2, Matthew D. Wallenstein4 and Eoin L. Brodie1 2011 Differential growth responses of soilbacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance frontier microbiology
Artursson, V., Finlay, R. D., and Jansson, J. K. (2005). Combined bromodeoxyuridine immunocapture andterminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis highlights differences in the active soil bacterialmetagenome due to glomus mosseae inoculation or plant species.Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1952–1966.
Artursson, V., and Jansson, J. K. (2003). Use of bromodeoxyuridine immunocapture to identify activebacteria associated with arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 6208–6215.
Allison, S. D., Czimczik, C. I., and Treseder, K. K. (2008). Microbial activity and soil respiration undernitrogen addition in alaskan boreal forest. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1156–1168.
Buckley, D. H., Huangyutitham, V., Hsu, S. F., and Nelson, T. A. (2007). Stable isotope probing with 15N2reveals novel noncultivated diazotrophs in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 3196–3204.
Borneman, J. (1999). Cultureindependent identification of microorganisms that respond to specified stimuli.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.65, 3398–3400
Fierer, N., Bradford, M. A., and Jackson, R. B. (2007a). Toward and ecological classification of soilbacteria. Ecology 88, 1354–1364
Papke, R. T., and Ward, D. M. (2004). The importance of physical isolation to microbial diversification.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 48, 293–303.
Zhou, J., Xia, B., Treves, D. S., Wu, L. Y., Marsh, T. L., O’Neill, R. V., Palumbo, A. V., and Tiedje, J. M.(2002). Spatial and resource factors influencing high microbial diversity in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68,326–334.
Waldrop, M. P., and Firestone, M. K. (2004). Microbial community utilization of recalcitrant and simplecarbon compounds: impact of oak-woodland plant communities. Oecologia 138, 275–284.
Wilson, M., and Lindow, S. E. (1994). Coexistence among epiphytic bacterial populations mediatedthrough nutritional resource partitioning. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 4468–4477
Drenovsky, R. E., Steenwerth, K. L., Jackson, L. E., and Scow, K. M. (2009). Land use and climatic factorsstructure regional patterns in soil microbial communities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 27–39.
Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., and Fierer, N. (2009). Pyrosequencingbased assessment of soil pHas a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5111–5120.
Chu, H., Fierer, N., Lauber, C. L., Caporaso, J. G., Knight, R., and Grogan, P. (2010). Soil bacterialdiversity in the arctic is not fundamentally different from that found in other biomes. Environ. Microbiol. 12,2998–3006.
Green, J. L., Bohannan, B. J. M., and Whitaker, R. J. (2008). Microbial biogeography: from taxonomy totraits. Science 320, 1039–1043
Stein, L. Y., and Nicol, G. W. (2011). Grand challenges in terrestrial microbiology. Front. Microbiol. 2:6.doi: 10.3389/ fmicb.2011.00006 Stein, L. Y., and Nicol, G. W. (2011). Grand challenges in terrestrialmicrobiology. Front. Microbiol. 2:6. doi: 10.3389/ fmicb.2011.00006
Radajewski, S., Ineson, P., Parekh, N. R., and Murrell, J. C. (2000). Stableisotope probing as a tool inmicrobial ecology. Nature 403, 646–649.
Griffiths, R. I., Manefield, M., Ostle, N., McNamara, N., O’Donnell, A. G., Bailey, M. J., and Whiteley, A.S. (2004). 13CO2 pulse labelling of plants in tandem with stable isotope robing:methodological considerations for examining microbial function in the rhizosphere. J. Microbiol. Methods 58,119–129.
Feth El Zahar, H., Wafa, A., Richard, C., Thierry, H., Christine, M., Marie-France, M., Christophe, M.,Lionel, R., Jèrùme, B., and Odile, B. (2007). Identification of cellulolytic bacteria in soil by stable isotopeprobing. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 625–634.
Schwartz, E. (2007). Characterization of growing microorganisms in soil by stable isotope probing withH218O. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 2541–2546.
Urbach, E., Vergin, K. L., and Giovannoni, S. J. (1999). Immunochemical detection and isolation of DNAfrom metabolically active bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 1207–1213
Yin, B., Crowley, D., Sparovek, G., De Melo, W. J., and Borneman, J. (2000). Bacterial unctionalredundancy along a soil reclamation gradient. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 4361–4365
Eluozo. S. N and 2Afiibor B .B (2013) mathematical model to monitor the behaviour of nitrogen on salmonella transport in homogenous fine sand in coastal area of port Harcourt, Niger delta of NigeriaWorld Journal of Science and Technology Research Vol. 1, No. 3, May 2013, PP: 53 -66
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal For Research In Mechanical & Civil Engineering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in