URBAN RESILIENCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN POVERTY, GOVERNANCE, AND SUSTAINABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/es.v9i5.2411Keywords:
Urban Poverty, Sustainable Development, Social Inclusion, Governance, Urban Sustainability Indicators (USIs), Economic Growth, AI in Urban Planning, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)Abstract
This systematic review evaluates the literature on urban poverty, good governance, and sustainable development from 2010 to 2024. Understanding the interplay between governance and sustainability is crucial for addressing urban poverty. The review examines various systematic and analytical methods and analyses key factors affecting urban sustainability, including social inclusion, governance, and technology. Findings reveal that sustainability initiatives often neglect social inclusion, underscoring the need to integrate vulnerable groups. The review addresses governance trade-offs, the effectiveness of smart governance, and the role of Urban Sustainability Indicators (USIs) in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It also discusses the environmental impacts of economic development in urban areas and the ongoing challenges of urban poverty. Special attention is given to North America, Nigeria, and Indonesia, highlighting that despite regional differences, urban poverty remains a concern across these diverse areas. Good governance is crucial for alleviating urban poverty and advancing sustainable development by fostering inclusive policies, efficient management, and community involvement. Effective governance ensures that public institutions are accountable and responsive to citizen needs. Sustainable urban development involves balancing economic, social, and environmental dimensions to create liveable cities that meet present and future needs. This includes strategies such as affordable housing, clean energy, waste management, and green spaces. Proper urban planning can lead to job creation, better education, and improved quality of life, while poor planning can result in slums, inequality, and deprivation. Innovations like AI offer potential solutions for addressing urban poverty through enhanced governance, but a collective and evidence-based approach is essential. The review highlights the need for strategic planning and interdisciplinary integration to tackle urban development challenges effectively, emphasizing the importance of data-driven and inclusive policies.
Downloads
References
Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., ... & Portugali, Y. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
Cohen, B., Almirall, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2016). The city as a lab: Open innovation meets the collaborative economy. California Management Review, 59(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125616683951
Gelb, A., & Clark, J. (2013). Identification for development: The biometrics revolution. CGD Working Paper 315. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. https://www.cgdev.org/publication/identification-development-biometrics-revolution-working-paper-315
Harrison, C., & Donnelly, I. A. (2011). A theory of smart cities. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2011, Hull, UK (Vol. 55, No. 1). Retrieved from https://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings55th/article/view/1703
Huang, L., Liu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Smart city operations and the environment: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11(5), 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051309
Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2014). Risk sharing and transactions costs: Evidence from Kenya’s mobile money revolution. American Economic Review, 104(1), 183-223. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.1.183
Labrique, A. B., Vasudevan, L., Kochi, E., Fabricant, R., & Mehl, G. (2013). mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Global Health: Science and Practice, 1(2), 160-171. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031
Monstadt, J., & Wolff, A. (2015). Energy transition or incremental change? Green policy agendas and the adaptability of the urban energy regime in Los Angeles. Energy Policy, 78, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.017
Ndung'u, I. (2018). Africa’s rising cities: How green and smart will they be?. Institute for Security Studies. Retrieved from https://issafrica.org/research/africa-report/africas-rising-cities-how-green-and-smart-will-they-be
Peixoto, T., & Fox, J. (2016). When does ICT-enabled citizen voice lead to government responsiveness? World Development, 99, 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.002
Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu02
Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity. https://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=978150954313
Hernandez, K., & Roberts, T. (2018). Leaving No One Behind in a Digital World: A Review and Analysis of the Evidence and Implications for the DFID Digital Strategy. Institute of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.19088/IDS.2018.225
Kumar, N., & Prakash, A. (2020). Smart City Development: Analyzing Initiatives and Challenges in India. Cities, 99, 102-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102411
McGranahan, G., & Satterthwaite, D. (2014). Urbanisation Concepts and Trends. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). https://pubs.iied.org/10709iied
Pieterse, E. (2019). Urban Governance and the Politics of Development in African Cities. International Development Planning Review, 41(3), 243-263. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2019.10
Satterthwaite, D. (2017). Urbanisation and Inequality Trends in Asia: Challenges of Inclusive Growth. Asian Development Bank Institute. https://www.adb.org/publications/urbanisation-inequality-trends-asia
United Nations. (2015). Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
Van den Berg, M. (2017). Technology and Urban Development: The Role of Innovation in Addressing Urban Poverty. Urban Studies, 54(5), 1083-1099. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016674903
Cohen, B., Almirall, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2016). The city as a lab: Open innovation meets the collaborative economy. California Management Review, 59(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125616683951
Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2022). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 6.3). The Cochrane Collaboration. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119536604
Huang, L., Liu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Smart city operations and the environment: A systematic review. Sustainability, 11(5), 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051309
Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2014). Risk sharing and transactions costs: Evidence from Kenya’s mobile money revolution. American Economic Review, 104(1), 183-223. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.1.183
Labrique, A. B., Vasudevan, L., Kochi, E., Fabricant, R., & Mehl, G. (2013). mHealth innovations as health system strengthening tools: 12 common applications and a visual framework. Global Health: Science and Practice, 1(2), 160-171. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00031
Mallett, R., Hagen-Zanker, J., Slater, R., & Duvendack, M. (2012). The Benefits and Challenges of Using Systematic Reviews in International Development Research. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4(3), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2012.711342
Monstadt, J., & Wolff, A. (2015). Energy transition or incremental change? Green policy agendas and the adaptability of the urban energy regime in Los Angeles. Energy Policy, 78, 213-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.017
Ndung'u, I. (2018). Africa’s rising cities: How green and smart will they be?. Institute for Security Studies. Retrieved from https://issafrica.org/research/africa-report/africas-rising-cities-how-green-and-smart-will-they-be
Peixoto, T., & Fox, J. (2016). When does ICT-enabled citizen voice lead to government responsiveness?. World Development, 99, 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.002
Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026
van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity. https://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9781509543136
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal For Research In Educational Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in
