Effects of Collaborative Drill Reinforcement on Problem-Comprehension Skill

Authors

  • Julius Garzon Teacher, Department of Education, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/es.v4i7.659

Keywords:

analytical thinking, collaboration,, problem-solving learning tasks, mathematical problems

Abstract

Effective comprehension in problem analysis is an essential factor for problem solving success. Critical Thinking is prerequisite to proper understanding of the process in deriving correct solution set. However, poor comprehension remains the bane for learners needing positive reinforcement. Learning by doing and constant drills are considered useful techniques especially when performed in a collaborative manner. Anchored on quasi-experimental design using two comparable groups, analysis of the t-test results revealed significant findings in terms of differences between performances of groups applying the intervention and not.  The significant increase from pretest to posttest of experimental group affirms the effectiveness of the collaborative reinforcement model in developing problem comprehension domain. Statistical evidence, thus, leads to conclusion that modified collaborative drill reinforcement tool contributes in reinforcing learners’ capacity in problem-solving learning tasks. Making use of drill activities enhances the ability of a learner to have consistent practice of analytical thinking skill through collaboration with peers to provide better understanding of problem content which is essential in the formulation of solution process leading to the right answer. The facilitative role of teacher during drill exercise is necessary to guide learners in getting the concept. Consistent practice in working with worded problems can help develop critical and problem-solving strategies. Hence, the intervention fits to this need and should be modeled across competencies by every teacher in their respective classrooms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Burns, M. K., Dean, J. D., & Foley, S. (2004). Pre-teaching unknown key words with incremental rehearsal to improve reading fluency comprehension with children identified as reading disabled. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 303-314.

Chard, D. J., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Word recognition: Research bases. In

D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: The bases and the basics (pp. 141-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cooke, N., & Guzaukas, R. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during

drill and practice: Three experiments. Education & Treatment of Children, 16(3), 213. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database.

Francis, D. J., & Stuebing, K. K. (1996). Development lag versus deficit models of reading. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 88(1), 3.

MacQuarrie, L., Tucker, J., Burns, M., & Hartman, B. (2002). comparison of retention rates

using traditional, drill sandwich, and incremental rehearsal flash card methods. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 584. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database.

Roberts, M., & Shapiro, E. (1996). Effects of Instructional Ratios on Students' Reading Performance in a Regular Education Program. Journal of School Psychology, 34(1), 73-92. Retrieved from ERIC database

Schofield, H. (1972). The Philosophy of Education An Introduction. London: George Allen and

Unwin Ltd.

Downloads

Published

2018-07-31

How to Cite

Garzon, J. (2018). Effects of Collaborative Drill Reinforcement on Problem-Comprehension Skill. International Journal For Research In Educational Studies, 4(7), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.53555/es.v4i7.659