Effects of Collaborative Drill Reinforcement on Problem-Comprehension Skill
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/es.v4i7.659Keywords:
analytical thinking, collaboration,, problem-solving learning tasks, mathematical problemsAbstract
Effective comprehension in problem analysis is an essential factor for problem solving success. Critical Thinking is prerequisite to proper understanding of the process in deriving correct solution set. However, poor comprehension remains the bane for learners needing positive reinforcement. Learning by doing and constant drills are considered useful techniques especially when performed in a collaborative manner. Anchored on quasi-experimental design using two comparable groups, analysis of the t-test results revealed significant findings in terms of differences between performances of groups applying the intervention and not. The significant increase from pretest to posttest of experimental group affirms the effectiveness of the collaborative reinforcement model in developing problem comprehension domain. Statistical evidence, thus, leads to conclusion that modified collaborative drill reinforcement tool contributes in reinforcing learners’ capacity in problem-solving learning tasks. Making use of drill activities enhances the ability of a learner to have consistent practice of analytical thinking skill through collaboration with peers to provide better understanding of problem content which is essential in the formulation of solution process leading to the right answer. The facilitative role of teacher during drill exercise is necessary to guide learners in getting the concept. Consistent practice in working with worded problems can help develop critical and problem-solving strategies. Hence, the intervention fits to this need and should be modeled across competencies by every teacher in their respective classrooms.
Downloads
References
Burns, M. K., Dean, J. D., & Foley, S. (2004). Pre-teaching unknown key words with incremental rehearsal to improve reading fluency comprehension with children identified as reading disabled. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 303-314.
Chard, D. J., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). Word recognition: Research bases. In
D. C. Simmons & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: The bases and the basics (pp. 141-168). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cooke, N., & Guzaukas, R. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during
drill and practice: Three experiments. Education & Treatment of Children, 16(3), 213. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database.
Francis, D. J., & Stuebing, K. K. (1996). Development lag versus deficit models of reading. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 88(1), 3.
MacQuarrie, L., Tucker, J., Burns, M., & Hartman, B. (2002). comparison of retention rates
using traditional, drill sandwich, and incremental rehearsal flash card methods. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 584. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database.
Roberts, M., & Shapiro, E. (1996). Effects of Instructional Ratios on Students' Reading Performance in a Regular Education Program. Journal of School Psychology, 34(1), 73-92. Retrieved from ERIC database
Schofield, H. (1972). The Philosophy of Education An Introduction. London: George Allen and
Unwin Ltd.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal For Research In Educational Studies (ISSN: 2208-2115)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
In consideration of the journal, Green Publication taking action in reviewing and editing our manuscript, the authors undersigned hereby transfer, assign, or otherwise convey all copyright ownership to the Editorial Office of the Green Publication in the event that such work is published in the journal. Such conveyance covers any product that may derive from the published journal, whether print or electronic. Green Publication shall have the right to register copyright to the Article in its name as claimant, whether separately
or as part of the journal issue or other medium in which the Article is included.
By signing this Agreement, the author(s), and in the case of a Work Made For Hire, the employer, jointly and severally represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere, and is not being considered for publication elsewhere in any form, except as provided herein. Each author’s signature should appear below. The signing author(s) (and, in