Environmental Ethics and Mineral Legislations in India for Sustainable Development

Authors

  • P. Sreenivasulu Department of Collegiate Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, India
  • P. Padmasree Department of Geology, Government Degree College(M), Anantapur, A.P., India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/bp.v2i3.142

Keywords:

Responsible Mining, India, Ethics, Environment, Mineral legislations.

Abstract

Mining and Mineral Exploration practices are very much essential for the economic prosperity of the Country. The environmental ethical problem of this field is the economic benefits on one hand and the environmental costs on the other hand. The problem of environmental impacts on exploitation and utilization of mineral resources presents a complex socioeconomic dilemma defying solution. Responsible Mining Principles and DPSIR (Drivers, Pressures, States, Impacts, and Responses) analysis are the two analytical tools which are highly supportive in a decisionmaking process. Through DPSIR and Stakeholder analysis, we can assess how future mining in India can be sustainably implemented. The analysis revealed that numerous stakeholders have to be taken into consideration with
a wide range of different interests. Strict environmental legislation of ‘National Mineral Policy’, ‘Environment Impact Assessment’ and ‘Polluter Pays Principle’ can ensure economic benefits while environmental impacts remain negligible. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Donella H. Meadows, Dennis L. Meadows, Jorgen Randers and William W. Behrens III, (1972) Limits to Growth, New York: New American Library.

Hansen, J., P. Kharecha, M. Sato, V. Masson-Delmotte, F. Ackerman, D. Beerling, P.J. Hearty, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, S.-L. Hsu, C. Parmesan, J. Rockstrom, E.J. Rohling, J. Sachs, P. Smith, K. Steffen, L. Van Susteren, K. von Schuckmann, and J.C. Zachos, (2013): Assessing "dangerous climate change": Required reduction of carbon emissions to protect young people, future generations and nature. PLOS ONE, 8, e81648, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081648.).

Harremoës,P.,Krauss, M.K.,(2006)Environmental Management and Ethics, Preliminary Draft, Institute of Environmentand Resources, Technical University of Denmark,

Kristensen, P., (2004). The DPSIR framework, in: Comprehensive/Detailed Assessment of the Vulnerability of Water Resources to Environmental Change in Africa Using River Basin Approach, UNEP Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya.

Mihir Deb., (2012). Environmental Ethics and Sustainability Issues in Mining Sector in India, Lecture, Tibetan House.New Delhi.

Ness, B. Anderberg, S. Olsson, L. (2010). Structuring problems in sustainability science: The multi-level DPSIR framework, Geoforum 41479-488.

Raja Gopal, V.D., (2010). Mineral Legislation in India for Sustainable Development. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis.S.V. Univ., Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Roy E. Cordato,.2001. The Polluter Pays Principle: A Proper Guide for Environmental PolicyInstitute for Research on the Economics of Taxation, IERT,Washington, D.C.

Sinne Hjælmso Hansen, Lise Celine Pedersen, Kristine Duelund Vilsgaard, Ingeborg Elbæk Nielsen and Steffen Foss Hansen (2013). Environmental and Ethical Aspects of Sustainable Mining in GreenlandJournal of Earth Science and Engineering3 pp213-224.

Smeets,E. andWeterings, R.,(1999.) Environmental Indicators: Typology and Overview, European Environment Agency,Copenhagen.

Tscherning, K. , K. Helming, B. Krippner, S. Sieber, S.G. Paloma, (2012). Does research applying the DPSIR frameworksupport decision making?, Land Use Policy29 102-110.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-31

How to Cite

Sreenivasulu, P., & Padmasree, P. (2016). Environmental Ethics and Mineral Legislations in India for Sustainable Development. International Journal For Research In Biology & Pharmacy, 2(3), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.53555/bp.v2i3.142